Price drops in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam
More homes in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schout Palspad 18
Semi-detached at Schout Palspad 18 in Hoogvliet Rotterdam (Hoogvliet Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1986 and has 112 m² of living space, a 211 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Hoogvliet (162 m). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Het Middelpunt (551 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jun 2026€ 449,500−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 474,500
Property details
- Living area
- 112 m²
- Plot
- 211 m²
- Construction year
- 1986
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 431,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoogvliet Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby7
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away14.8 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away13.3 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.5
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land28%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot151 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space93 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)133 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,700 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 437 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 563 pupils
Disadvantage score 97 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 426 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 275 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
39th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
56th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.