Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Stroveer 120
Apartment at Stroveer 120 in Rotterdam (Oude Noorden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 95 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Stadhuis (506 m). The nearest primary school is De Klimop (360 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced23 Jun 2026€ 459,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 95 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 418,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold end date: 01-04-2054)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oude Noorden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside32.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical540 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.183 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.