Price drops in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam
More homes in and around Hoogvliet Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Tureluur 32
Terraced house at Tureluur 32 in Hoogvliet Rotterdam (Hoogvliet Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 154 m² of living space, a 206 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Tussenwater (314 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Plevier (266 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jun 2026€ 465,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 154 m²
- Plot
- 206 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 456,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoogvliet Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby26
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away14.8 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away13.3 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.5
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place10.88 ratio
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot127 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space105 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)187 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical580 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,575 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 25 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 437 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 563 pupils
Disadvantage score 97 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
39th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 426 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 17% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
22nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
32nd percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 214 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 177 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.