Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Amsterdam, averaging −5.3%. The biggest cut was € 155.000 (Vossiusstraat 17 D, Amsterdam). Last updated 15 September.
All houses dropping in price in Amsterdam →House prices and market figures in Amsterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Vaartstraat 48 3
Apartment at Vaartstraat 48-3 in Amsterdam (Schinkelbuurt-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1913 and has 99 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Amstelveenseweg (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Kleine Nicolaas (593 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 750,000−€ 30,000
- Off Fundayesterday
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 780,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale1 Jun 2026€ 815,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 11.6% With children−19.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 66.1% Single-person+26 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22.3% Other multi-person−6.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 17% Owner-occupied−40 pt vs the Netherlands
- 49% Social housing+21 pt vs the Netherlands
- 35% Private rental+21 pt vs the Netherlands
- 45.5% Dutch background−26.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 19.7% Rest of Europe+10.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 34.4% Outside Europe+15.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Schinkelbuurt-Zuid neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
94 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 62.6% Theft / burglary+23.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.7% Other−14.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.8% Violence and threats−1.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6.6% Vandalism−2.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 3.3% Public order−5.4 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: excellent
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
300 permits within 500 m · 24 construction plans within 1 km · 43 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
98th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 203 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 1340 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 441 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 90 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
87th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
94th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 288 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 224 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 405 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 299 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
72nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
35th percentile: average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 186 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 169 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 229 exam candidates
99th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VWO · 105 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 173 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

