Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Voermanweg 672
Apartment at Voermanweg 672 in Rotterdam (Oosterflank neighbourhood). The home was built in 1987 and has 55 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Oosterflank (179 m). The nearest primary school is De Pionier (371 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 275,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 295,000
Property details
- Living area
- 55 m²
- Construction year
- 1987
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 247,000
- Ownership
- Property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 04-03-2084)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oosterflank, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental58%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away8.7 km
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,890 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical10 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.996 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
63rd percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 369 pupils
Disadvantage score 110 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.