Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Willem van Hillegaersbergstraat 64
Apartment at Willem van Hillegaersbergstraat 64 in Rotterdam (Hillegersberg Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1914 and has 117 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (480 m). The nearest primary school is Tarcisius (236 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced6 Jul 2026€ 589,000−€ 10,000
- For sale18 Jun 2026
- Under offer15 Jun 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 599,000−€ 16,000
- Under offer3 Jun 2026€ 615,000
Property details
- Living area
- 117 m²
- Construction year
- 1914
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillegersberg Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport3.5 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.6%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated210 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.963 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away22.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)29.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.6 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.5 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away7,597 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits within 500 m · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
92nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 67 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.