Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zwijndrechtsestraat 38
Terraced house at Zwijndrechtsestraat 38 in Rotterdam (Bloemhof neighbourhood). The home was built in 1904 and has 94 m² of living space, a 70 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Maashaven (831 m). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Blijvliet (292 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)30 Jun 2026
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 260,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 94 m²
- Plot
- 70 m²
- Construction year
- 1904
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 238,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bloemhof, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable9%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.5 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space74 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,254 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,014 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.014 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.