Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Slaghekstraat 75 D
Apartment at Slaghekstraat 75 in Rotterdam (Hillesluis neighbourhood). The home was built in 1928 and has 132 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Stadion (779 m). The nearest primary school is De Gouden Griffel (236 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 325,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 335,000
Property details
- Living area
- 132 m²
- Construction year
- 1928
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 252,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillesluis, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.6%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High22.1%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated195 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2587 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2374 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share25.7%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High21.7%
- High stress (neighbourhood)
- Much stress27.3%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.1 km
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.23 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)18%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)67.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)57.2%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure9
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors32.2%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels5%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions52 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)74 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.6 km
- Distance to airport
- Nearby8.2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Heavy train noise2.1%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise13.7%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.014 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.7 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.4 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.1 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away3,778 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
35th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
47th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
62nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
95th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
87th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.