Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Cornelis Suyslaan 42
Apartment at Cornelis Suyslaan 42 in Rijswijk (Rembrandtkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1953 and has 55 mΒ² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Godfried Bomansschool (90 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Aug 2026β¬ 272,500ββ¬ 12,500
- Listed for sale22 Jun 2026β¬ 285,000
Property details
- Living area
- 55 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1953
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- β¬ 215,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rembrandtkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.3%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.7%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)78.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure12
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.3%
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels7%
- Distance to airport
- Nearby12.4 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.3%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 Β΅g/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.2 Β°C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average46.1%
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts3
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot7,090 mΒ²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low0.876 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)43.3 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits Β· 3 construction plans within 500 m Β· 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
65th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 40 pupils Β· total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
40th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 50 pupils Β· total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
80th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 53 pupils Β· total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
23rd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 25 pupils Β· total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
62nd percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
36th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 34 pupils Β· total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 66: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
2nd percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 47 pupils Β· total 607 pupils
Disadvantage score 125: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
7th percentile: low Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 35 pupils Β· total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 115 exam candidates
26th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 81 exam candidates
27th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 161 exam candidates
75th percentile: average Β· 100% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/PRO Β· 12 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
45th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 27 exam candidates
44th percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 227 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.