Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Minister Aalberselaan 100
Apartment at Minister Aalberselaan 100 in Rijswijk (Ministerbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 75 mΒ² of living space and 3 bedrooms. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Steenvoorde (214 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Aug 2026β¬ 287,500ββ¬ 11,500
- Listed for sale25 Jun 2026β¬ 299,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- β
- WOZ value
- β¬ 309,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ministerbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated135 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share24.4%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High18.2%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity22
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.3 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)76.2%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.2%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5β2 m)0.64 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to airport
- Nearby12.5 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.3%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.1 Β΅g/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.3 Β°C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average48.5%
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work30.9%Β· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes50.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot396 mΒ²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low0.887 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)42.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits Β· 22 construction plans within 500 m Β· 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
58th percentile: average Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 32 pupils Β· total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
12th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 32 pupils Β· total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
96th percentile: high Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 55 pupils Β· total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 74 pupils Β· total 488 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 1% of schools
58th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
13th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 27 pupils Β· total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
38th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
83rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 17 pupils Β· total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
34th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 43 pupils Β· total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 42 pupils Β· total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
27th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 161 exam candidates
26th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 81 exam candidates
45th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 27 exam candidates
7th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 115 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/PRO
2nd percentile: low Β· 75% passed Β· CE avg 5.8 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 111 exam candidates
49th percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 100 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO
no exam results Β· PRO
75th percentile: average Β· 100% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/PRO Β· 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.