Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/08/2026 | Minister Aalberselaan 100 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 299.000 β¬ 287.500 | -3.9% | 74 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Cornelis Suyslaan 42 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 285.000 β¬ 272.500 | -4.4% | 55 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Hendrik Ravesteijnplein 34 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 285.000 β¬ 275.000 | -3.5% | 63 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Huis te Landelaan 474 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 295.000 β¬ 285.000 | -3.4% | 70 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Steigerstraat 16 Den Haag | β¬ 1.350.000 β¬ 1.275.000 | -5.6% | 221 mΒ²160 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Abrikozenstraat 92 Den Haag | β¬ 399.000 β¬ 389.000 | -2.5% | 88 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Dirklangendwarsstraat 5 Delft | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 360.000 | -4.0% | 60 mΒ²48 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Hof van Delftlaan 7 Delft | β¬ 920.000 β¬ 880.000 | -4.3% | 157 mΒ²140 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Ursulaland 100 Den Haag | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 375.000 | -5.1% | 94 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | DaniΓ«l Catterwijckstr 57 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 295.000 β¬ 275.000 | -6.8% | 69 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Dr. Lelykade 196 E Den Haag | β¬ 1.395.000 β¬ 1.345.000 | -3.6% | 154 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Klaprooslaan 93 Rotterdam | β¬ 275.000 β¬ 260.000 | -5.5% | 62 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Calliopestraat 50 Den Haag | β¬ 585.000 β¬ 559.000 | -4.4% | 112 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Alexander Gogelweg 91 Den Haag | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 700.000 | -3.5% | 145 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Wachtumstraat 42 Den Haag | β¬ 515.000 β¬ 500.000 | -2.9% | 95 mΒ²129 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Dr. Lelykade 226 D Den Haag | β¬ 895.000 β¬ 850.000 | -5.0% | 165 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Karekietlaan 9 Leidschendam | β¬ 1.450.000 β¬ 1.400.000 | -3.5% | 266 mΒ²339 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Burgemeester Elsenlaan 323 F109 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 485.000 β¬ 470.000 | -3.1% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Deltapromenade 398 Den Haag | β¬ 1.195.000 β¬ 1.100.000 | -8.0% | 165 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Badhuisstraat 21 Den Haag | β¬ 795.000 β¬ 750.000 | -5.7% | 165 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Huis te Landelaan 474
Apartment at Huis te Landelaan 474 in Rijswijk (Stationskwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1961 and has 71 mΒ² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (391 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Piramide (196 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Aug 2026β¬ 285,000ββ¬ 10,000
- Listed for sale25 Jun 2026β¬ 295,000
Property details
- Living area
- 71 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1961
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- β¬ 273,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stationskwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellβ
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsβ
- High crime118.5 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress43 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Few solar panels1%
- Distance to nearest transmission mastβ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)80 m
- Distance to railway lineβ
- Close to railway243 m
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby12.2 km
- Within Wbb soil locationβ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)β
- Above-average nuisance6.6%
- Noise loadβ
- Heavy62 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)β
- Disturbing53 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- Elevated1.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot2,555 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)177 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Economical470 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.939 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityβ
- Far away38 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m Β· 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
38th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
13th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 27 pupils Β· total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
83rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 17 pupils Β· total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
65th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 40 pupils Β· total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
58th percentile: average Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 32 pupils Β· total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
40th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 50 pupils Β· total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
80th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 53 pupils Β· total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
23rd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 25 pupils Β· total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
7th percentile: low Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 35 pupils Β· total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 115 exam candidates
26th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 81 exam candidates
27th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 161 exam candidates
45th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 27 exam candidates
75th percentile: average Β· 100% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/PRO Β· 12 exam candidates
49th percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 100 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
44th percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 227 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.