Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Rotterdam, averaging −5.2%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Calandstraat 20 E, Rotterdam). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Rotterdam →House prices and market figures in Rotterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Hoofdweg 129
Detached at Hoofdweg 129 in Rotterdam (Het Lage Land neighbourhood). The home was built in 1932 and has 96 m² of living space, a 604 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Alexander (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool voor Christelijk Onderwijs Onze Wereld (437 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Price reducedtoday€ 595,000−€ 50,000
- For sale10 days ago
- Under offer13 Jul 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 645,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 21.8% With children−9.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 57.5% Single-person+17.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 20.7% Other multi-person−7.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38% Owner-occupied−19 pt vs the Netherlands
- 39% Social housing+11 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23% Private rental+9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 51% Dutch background−21.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.8% Rest of Europe+3.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 36.2% Outside Europe+17.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23.5% Lower−2.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44.4% Intermediate+3.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 32.1% Higher−1.2 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Het Lage Land neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
733 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 38.7% Theft / burglarysame as the Netherlands
- 31.4% Other−1.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9.7% Violence and threatssame as the Netherlands
- 5.3% Vandalism−3.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15% Public order+6.3 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
55 permits within 500 m · 58 construction plans within 1 km · 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
31st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
40th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 35% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
90th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 685 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 27% of schools
73rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
63rd percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · MAVO
72nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

