Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Rotterdam, averaging −5.2%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Calandstraat 20 E, Rotterdam). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Rotterdam →House prices and market figures in Rotterdam →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Pietje de Fluiterhof 11
Terraced house at Pietje de Fluiterhof 11 in Rotterdam (Nieuw Crooswijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2024 and has 64 m² of living space, a 53 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Noen (639 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 489,000−€ 56,000
- Off Funda12 days ago
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 545,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 31.9% With childrensame as the Netherlands
- 48.3% Single-person+8.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 19.8% Other multi-person−8.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18% Owner-occupied−39 pt vs the Netherlands
- 70% Social housing+42 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13% Private rental−1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 46.6% Dutch background−25.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9.2% Rest of Europesame as the Netherlands
- 44.2% Outside Europe+25.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 25.7% Lowersame as the Netherlands
- 29.4% Intermediate−11.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44.9% Higher+11.6 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Nieuw Crooswijk neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
288 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 35% Theft / burglary−4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 35.4% Other+2.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.2% Violence and threats+8.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9.6% Vandalismsame as the Netherlands
- 1.8% Public order−6.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
68 permits within 500 m · 254 construction plans within 1 km · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
45th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
84th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
69th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 61% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
33rd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

