Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Houtweg 70
Apartment at Houtweg 70 in 's-Gravenhage (Willemspark neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 84 mΒ² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (804 m). The nearest primary school is Willemspark (375 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Aug 2026β¬ 465,000ββ¬ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 84 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- β¬ 480,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Willemspark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated105 persons
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area49
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate⬠7.15
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.1%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure29
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 Β°C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5β2 m)1.12 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable32%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels6%
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site0.7 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,224 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)140 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low0.839 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away41.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
26 permits Β· 1 construction plan within 500 m Β· 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
84th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 45 pupils Β· total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 48 pupils Β· total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 58 pupils Β· total 429 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 220 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile: average Β· DIA Β· grade 8: 49 pupils Β· total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
32nd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 36 pupils Β· total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
4th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 18 pupils Β· total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 108: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
99th percentile: high Β· DOE Β· grade 8: 55 pupils Β· total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile: low Β· 79% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 130 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low Β· 86% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 225 exam candidates
61st percentile: average Β· 96% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 69 exam candidates
61st percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 175 exam candidates
90th percentile: high Β· 100% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 6 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 136 exam candidates
no exam results Β· HAVO/VWO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
5th percentile: low Β· 81% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 116 exam candidates
93rd percentile: high Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.9 Β· VWO Β· 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.