Price drops in and around Heerhugowaard
More homes in and around Heerhugowaard whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jac. van Maerlantlaan 55
Terraced house at Jac. van Maerlantlaan 55 in Heerhugowaard (Schrijverswijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1970 and has 167 m² of living space, a 327 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Heerhugowaard (922 m). The nearest primary school is IKC de Poolster (241 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced2 Jul 2026€ 625,000−€ 24,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 649,000
Property details
- Living area
- 167 m²
- Plot
- 327 m²
- Construction year
- 1970
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 693,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schrijverswijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away9.2 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.55 ratio
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure9
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater33 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot105 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy85%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels55%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions8 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space150 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)33 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
32nd percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 291 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 5 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 227 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 36 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
no exam results · PRO
23rd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 205 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 134 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 140 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.