Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Joost van Geelstraat 43 B
Terraced house at Joost van Geelstraat 43B in Rotterdam (Middelland neighbourhood). The home was built in 1903 and has 58 m² of living space, a 102 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Dijkzigt (729 m). The nearest primary school is Mariaschool Schietbaanlaan (124 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jul 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 58 m²
- Plot
- 102 m²
- Construction year
- 1903
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 426,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Middelland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated320 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2386 score
- Distance to sex establishment or swingers' club
- Right next door (<100 m)93 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime81.3 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure30
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.7 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.7%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.48 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels4%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.4%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise15.6%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.3 µg/kg
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work44.3%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes54.6%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space91 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,357 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.214 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away22.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
29 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
40th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
27th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 339 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 332 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
36th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
48th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
65th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.