Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Laan van Spieringshoek 2
Semi-detached at Laan van Spieringshoek 2 in Schiedam (Spieringshoek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 175 m² of living space, a 300 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Nieuwland (437 m). The nearest primary school is De Taaltuin (507 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 649,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 175 m²
- Plot
- 300 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 558,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Spieringshoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2144 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1565 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share25.1%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High21.1%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.7 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)74.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)76.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.7%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.47 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels6%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions52 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway234 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby5.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.6%
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.2%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.3%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated3 µg/kg
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot191 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space121 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,534 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,007 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
32nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 576 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 135: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 30% of schools
19th percentile: low · DOE · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 92: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 407 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
18th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
20th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 243 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO
28th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.