Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Amersfoort, averaging −4.7%. The biggest cut was € 145.000 (Vredehofstraat 9, Soest). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Amersfoort →House prices and market figures in Amersfoort →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Koesteeg 64
Apartment at Koesteeg 64 in Amersfoort (Grote Haag neighbourhood). The home was built in 1986 and has 73 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Centraal (935 m). The nearest primary school is P.C. basisschool Prins Willem Alexanderschool (247 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 395,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale22 Jun 2026€ 425,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 11.9% With children−19.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 65.7% Single-person+25.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22.4% Other multi-person−6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 29% Owner-occupied−28 pt vs the Netherlands
- 33% Social housing+5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38% Private rental+24 pt vs the Netherlands
- 74.5% Dutch background+2.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6.1% Rest of Europe−3.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.4% Outside Europesame as the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Grote Haag neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
121 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 54.3% Theft / burglary+15.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 25.9% Other−7.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.6% Violence and threats−1.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 4.3% Vandalism−4.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6.9% Public order−1.8 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: very good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
300 permits within 500 m · 30 construction plans within 1 km · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 335 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
52nd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 400 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
3rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 29% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 54% of schools
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 459 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 137 exam candidates
67th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
97th percentile: high · 94% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 87 exam candidates
41st percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 241 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
32nd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

