Price drops in and around Alkmaar
More homes in and around Alkmaar whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lindenlaan 76
Terraced house at Lindenlaan 76 in Alkmaar (Nassaukwartier en Hout neighbourhood). The home was built in 1905 and has 129 m² of living space, a 125 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Alkmaar (863 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Kring (261 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced15 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 540,000
Property details
- Living area
- 129 m²
- Plot
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 1905
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 588,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nassaukwartier en Hout, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime79.6 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)23%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure44
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity9
- Distance to nearest induced earthquake
- Earthquake very nearby2.3 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot52 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space76 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,532 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,040 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.506 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
44 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 623 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 478 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
no recent test score · total 59 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 124 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 404 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
32nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 102 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
22nd percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 75 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 112 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
55th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 123 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
27th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 251 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 51 exam candidates
86th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 39 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.