Price drops in and around Eindhoven
More homes in and around Eindhoven whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Eindhoven, averaging −4.2%. The biggest cut was € 305.000 (Hoge Duinlaan 13, Waalre). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Eindhoven →House prices and market figures in Eindhoven →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Pioenroosstraat 63
Terraced house at Pioenroosstraat 63 in Eindhoven (Kerstroosplein neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 91 m² of living space, a 92 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Eindhoven Centraal (3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Floralaan (188 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 425,000−€ 10,000
- For sale27 Aug 2026
- Sold (conditional)12 Aug 2026
- Under offer7 Aug 2026
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026€ 435,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale8 Jul 2026€ 450,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 27.6% With children−3.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 52.9% Single-person+12.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 19.5% Other multi-person−8.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 33% Owner-occupied−24 pt vs the Netherlands
- 51% Social housing+23 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16% Private rental+2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 52.8% Dutch background−19.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16.1% Rest of Europe+6.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 31.4% Outside Europe+12.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 33.5% Lower+7.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 32.9% Intermediate−7.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 33.5% Highersame as the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Kerstroosplein neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
138 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 21.3% Theft / burglary−17.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 55.1% Other+21.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.5% Violence and threats+2.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.1% Vandalism−1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 2.9% Public order−5.8 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
134 permits within 500 m · 23 construction plans within 1 km · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
73rd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 40% of schools
76th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 614 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 446 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 349 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 370 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
76th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 272 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 539 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 41: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
93rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 267 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
70th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
62nd percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 169 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
48th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 23 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 277 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
69th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 220 exam candidates
50th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 153 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 141 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

