Price drops in and around Den Haag

More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.

Property report01/08
No surprises after the keys.
01
What are you buying?

The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.

02
Is the price realistic?

Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?

03
What is living here like?

Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.

04
What shape is it in?

What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.

05
What is round the corner?

How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.

06
What could go wrong?

From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.

07
Much competition?

Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.

08
Buy it or not?

A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.

Zeekant 103 C, Den Haag-5.6%
€ 425.000€ 450.000
Zeekant 103 C
A
62
Den Haagtoday
Neptunusstraat 64, Den Haag-0.6%
€ 800.000€ 805.000
Neptunusstraat 64
C
157
Den Haagtoday
Jan Barendselaan 195 A, Poeldijk-0.7%
€ 565.000€ 569.000
Jan Barendselaan 195 A
A
118
Poeldijktoday
Waldeck Pyrmontkade 14, Den Haag-7.5%
€ 430.000€ 465.000
Waldeck Pyrmontkade 14
B
78
Den Haagtoday
Van Brederodestraat 125, Den Haag-5.9%
€ 400.000€ 425.000
Van Brederodestraat 125
E
85
Den Haagtoday
Kerklaan 24 B, Wateringen-5.6%
€ 425.000€ 450.000
Kerklaan 24 B
A
85
Wateringentoday
Kerklaan 24 A, Wateringen-10.5%
€ 425.000€ 475.000
Kerklaan 24 A
A
85
Wateringentoday
Laan van Nieuw-Oost-Indië 117, Den Haag-2.7%
€ 365.000€ 375.000
Laan van Nieuw-Oost-Indië 117
C
78
Den Haagtoday
Blaricumseplein 8, Den Haag-3.8%
€ 364.500€ 379.000
Blaricumseplein 8
C
74
Den Haagtoday
Zwolsestraat 11 B, Den Haag-10.3%
€ 1.099.000€ 1.225.000
Zwolsestraat 11 B
C
274
Den Haagtoday
Weissenbruchstraat 1 D, Den Haag-3.4%
€ 749.000€ 775.000
Weissenbruchstraat 1 D
C
161
Den Haagtoday
Waalsdorperweg 63, Den Haag-4.1%
€ 1.295.000€ 1.350.000
Waalsdorperweg 63
E
222
Den Haagtoday
Van Boetzelaerlaan 117 A, Den Haag-14.8%
€ 1.150.000€ 1.350.000
Van Boetzelaerlaan 117 A
A
157
Den Haagtoday
Rouboslaan 66, Voorschoten-2.4%
€ 815.000€ 835.000
Rouboslaan 66
A
147
Voorschotentoday
Mient 477, Den Haag-1.4%
€ 340.000€ 345.000
Mient 477
C
81
Den Haagtoday
Lijnbaan 184, Den Haag-6.3%
€ 299.000€ 319.000
Lijnbaan 184
F
70
Den Haagtoday
Randveen 596
Photo 2 of Randveen 596Photo 3 of Randveen 596Photo 4 of Randveen 596Photo 5 of Randveen 596
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionInstall

Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.

For salePrice reduced -6.3%

Randveen 596

Den Haag · 2544RM

Apartment at Randveen 596 in 's-Gravenhage (Venen, Oorden en Raden neighbourhood). The home was built in 2026 and has 83 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (4.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Anne Frank (269 m).

832 beds2026Label A++Apartment
Asking price€ 445,000
Was€ 475,000
Realistic price (indication)Only visible with Huisverklikker Pro
See it with Huisverklikker Pro

Price & status history

  1. Price reduced
    3 Aug 2026
    € 445,000
    € 30,000
  2. Listed for sale
    3 Jun 2026
    € 475,000

Property details

Living area83 m²
Construction year2026
Property typeApartment
Bedrooms2
Bathrooms0
Energy labelA++
WOZ value€ 213,000
OwnershipLeasehold
Estate agent

WOZ value over the years

Fetching WOZ history…

Age composition of the neighbourhood

This neighbourhoodNetherlands
Share of residents per age group in the Venen, Oorden en Raden neighbourhood against the Netherlands, source CBS.

Features

Points to note · Demographics11
Share of social assistance recipientsHigh8.6%· NL 2.3%
Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)High21.1%· NL 11.2%
Residents in 100m grid cellVery densely populated95 persons
Liveability classInadequateinsufficient
Liveability scoreclearly below average-0.3627 score
Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyMuch more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2312 score
Livability Meter: housing stockClearly below average-0.1354 score
Physical limitations (neighbourhood)high share31.9%· NL 15.2%
Net labour participationLow57%· NL 72%
Obesity (neighbourhood)High21.2%· NL 15.6%
Overweight (neighbourhood)Much higher than average60.3%· NL 50.8%
Points to note · Neighbourhood & market6
Distance to interchange stationFar away6.1 km
Children per primary school place (proxy)Many children per place3.11 ratio
Score nearest primary school (percentile)Low (bottom tenth)6%
Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)63%· NL 90.1%
Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)61%· NL 88.1%
Permits <500 m (12 months)Much building pressure8
Points to note · Environment & risk10
Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)Much neighbour nuisance10.9%
Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)High2.4%
Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)High2.9%
PFAS measurement above norm (closest)Above the standardYes
Can find cooling outside the homeFew people find cooling outside42.7%
Able to find cooling in the propertyFew people can cool off indoors39%
Number of risk sources within 1 kmMany sources10
Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 kmCluster of risky facilities nearby5
Max. flood depth (LIWO)Deep (0.5–2 m)1.59 m
Flood risk classHigh flood risklarge
Points to note10
Shared plotShared plotYes
Building statusPermission, not yet builtBuilding permit granted
Share of renewable energymoderate share sustainable42%
Share of homes with solar powerFew solar panels6%· NL 36%
Waste collection charge (municipality, average)Above-average waste collection charge€ 425
Within Wbb soil locationWithin registered soil locationYes
Large industrial businesses within 5 kmMultiple industrial businesses4
PFAS standard breach within 10 kmLimit exceeded within 10 kmYes
PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)Elevated2.1 µg/kg
Proportion of flexible employment contractsMuch flexible work45.8%· NL 32.5%
Plus points10
Zoning purpose (main category)Residential designationresidential
Plot area (cadastral plot)Very generous plot8,033 m²
Calculated CO₂ emissionsLow emissions7 kg/m2/yr
Energy index (primary fossil)Efficient (label A/B)39 kWh/m²/yr
Energy labelEconomicalA++
Avg. natural gas consumptionEconomical700 m³· NL 800%
Property tax rate dwellings (municipality)Low property tax rate0.0513%
WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)Rising property values6.8%
Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmNone in the neighbourhood0
Background concentration SO₂Very low0.867 µg/m³

Stations

Den Haag Moerwijk4.3 km · Train station
Rijswijk4.8 km · Train station
Grote Markt5.7 km · Light rail
Den Haag HS5.9 km · Train station

Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood

Tap a category to show or hide it.

6 permits within 500 m · 55 construction plans within 1 km · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.

Schools

Primary schools: doorstroomtoets
Basisschool Anne Frank

6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 462 pupils

Disadvantage score 149: more disadvantage than 100% of schools

269 m
Nutsbasisschool Woonstede

13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 201 pupils

Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools

567 m
Islamitische Basisschool Yunus Emre

8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 316 pupils

Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools

739 m
Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Zuidwester

25th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 369 pupils

Disadvantage score 111: more disadvantage than 98% of schools

806 m
Prof Mr A Anema Basisschool

3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 365 pupils

Disadvantage score 101: more disadvantage than 98% of schools

815 m
Rooms Katholieke Basisschool Petrus Donders

31st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 238 pupils

Disadvantage score 87: more disadvantage than 96% of schools

952 m
Erasmusschool

7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 297 pupils

Disadvantage score 97: more disadvantage than 97% of schools

973 m
KC Koos Meinderts

49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils

Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools

1.4 km
De Drentse Hoek

61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 198 pupils

Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools

1.6 km
Nutsbasisschool Morgenstond

81st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 209 pupils

Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 66% of schools

1.7 km
Secondary schools: exam results
Lucas VO Den Haag Zuid-West voor algemeen bijzonder vwo, havo, mavo, vmbo, Beresteinlaan 627

78th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates

552 m
Hofstede College voor bijzonder Praktijkonderwijs

no exam results · PRO

1.2 km
Lucas VO Den Haag Zuid-West voor algemeen bijzonder vwo, havo, mavo, vmbo, Droogscheerdersgaarde 70

no exam results · VBO/MAVO

1.2 km
Avicenna College Den Haag voor mavo, havo en vwo

no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO

1.7 km
Yuverta

74th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates

2.0 km
Lucas VO Den Haag Zuid-West voor algemeen bijzonder vwo, havo, mavo, vmbo - WVC

2nd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates

2.4 km
Maris College voor Mavo Vmbo Lwoo, Cantateplein 27

73rd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates

2.5 km
Maris College voor Mavo Vmbo Lwoo, Toscaninistraat 187

no exam results · VBO/MAVO

2.5 km
Hofstad VO voor bijzonder vwo, havo, mavo, vmbo

13th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates

2.7 km
Maris College voor Mavo Vmbo Lwoo, Mgr. Nolenslaan 16

52nd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates

2.8 km

Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

Neighbourhood news

What do others think?