Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Heer Bokelweg 190
Apartment at Heer Bokelweg 190 in Rotterdam (Agniesebuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1997 and has 127 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Stadhuis (495 m). The nearest primary school is De Klimop (349 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted1 Aug 2026€ 550,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 127 m²
- Construction year
- 1997
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 577,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 19-05-2095)
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Agniesebuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High18.6%
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1788 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental62%
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime158 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)76.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)73.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure27
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity6
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside31.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors33.8%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby7
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.29 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)711 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)30 m
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway176 m
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise14%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,235 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical560 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.152 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)27.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
24 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
23rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
55th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
48th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
8th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
47th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.