Price drops in and around Den Hoorn (ZH)
More homes in and around Den Hoorn (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/08/2026 | Houtweg 70 Den Haag | β¬ 475.000 β¬ 465.000 | -2.1% | 86 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Minister Aalberselaan 100 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 299.000 β¬ 287.500 | -3.9% | 74 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Cornelis Suyslaan 42 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 285.000 β¬ 272.500 | -4.4% | 55 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Hendrik Ravesteijnplein 34 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 285.000 β¬ 275.000 | -3.5% | 63 mΒ² | |||
01/08/2026 | Huis te Landelaan 474 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 295.000 β¬ 285.000 | -3.4% | 70 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Joost van Geelstraat 43 B Rotterdam | β¬ 425.000 β¬ 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Laan van Spieringshoek 2 Schiedam | β¬ 675.000 β¬ 649.500 | -3.8% | 172 mΒ²300 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Abrikozenstraat 92 Den Haag | β¬ 399.000 β¬ 389.000 | -2.5% | 88 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Dirklangendwarsstraat 5 Delft | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 360.000 | -4.0% | 60 mΒ²48 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Hof van Delftlaan 7 Delft | β¬ 920.000 β¬ 880.000 | -4.3% | 157 mΒ²140 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | DaniΓ«l Catterwijckstr 57 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 295.000 β¬ 275.000 | -6.8% | 69 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Klaprooslaan 93 Rotterdam | β¬ 275.000 β¬ 260.000 | -5.5% | 62 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Calliopestraat 50 Den Haag | β¬ 585.000 β¬ 559.000 | -4.4% | 112 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Alexander Gogelweg 91 Den Haag | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 700.000 | -3.5% | 145 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Wachtumstraat 42 Den Haag | β¬ 515.000 β¬ 500.000 | -2.9% | 95 mΒ²129 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Mgr. W.M. Bekkerslaan 14 Maassluis | β¬ 350.000 β¬ 335.000 | -4.3% | 85 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Ruilstraat 4 A Rotterdam | β¬ 395.500 β¬ 375.000 | -5.2% | 68 mΒ²60 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Burgemeester Elsenlaan 323 F109 Rijswijk (ZH) | β¬ 485.000 β¬ 470.000 | -3.1% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Deltapromenade 398 Den Haag | β¬ 1.195.000 β¬ 1.100.000 | -8.0% | 165 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Roemeensestraat 12 A01 Rotterdam | β¬ 275.000 β¬ 265.000 | -3.6% | 76 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Woudseweg 8
Terraced house at Woudseweg 8 in Den Hoorn (Den Hoorn neighbourhood). The home was built in 1986 and has 180 mΒ² of living space, a 312 mΒ² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Delft (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is CBS Het Talent (434 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted2 Aug 2026β¬ 795,000ββ¬ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 845,000
Property details
- Living area
- 180 mΒ²
- Plot
- 312 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1986
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- β¬ 556,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Den Hoorn, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellβ
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Distance to interchange stationβ
- Far away9.6 km
- Distance to business districtβ
- Adjacent to business park15 m
- Hospitality within 25 mβ
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Children per primary school place (proxy)β
- Many children per place1.9 ratio
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress45 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)β
- Above the standardYes
- Number of risk sources within 1 kmβ
- Many sources6
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)β
- Very high groundwater23 m above sea level
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Above national average⬠546,000
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityβ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)740 m
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby8.8 km
- Within Wbb soil locationβ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Noise loadβ
- Heavy63 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)β
- Disturbing53 dB
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmβ
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectβ
- Noticeably warmer1.3 Β°C
- Traffic on your own streetβ
- Busy through traffic route7,500 per day
- Shared plotβ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaβ
- Very spacious plot174 mΒ²
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Many solar panels48%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsβ
- Ample roof space164 mΒ²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Economical630 mΒ³
- Solar potential roofβ
- Very high potential11,729 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpβ
- Excellent yield1,021 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits Β· 1 construction plan within 500 m Β· 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
82nd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 49 pupils Β· total 283 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 51 pupils Β· total 363 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 84 pupils Β· total 600 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 35 pupils Β· total 359 pupils
Disadvantage score 165: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
81st percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 254 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 14 pupils Β· total 133 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
64th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
80th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 198 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
38th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 19 pupils Β· total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
39th percentile: average Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 178 exam candidates
23rd percentile: low Β· 86% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 110 exam candidates
51st percentile: average Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 283 exam candidates
no exam results Β· BRUGJAAR
12th percentile: low Β· 86% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 90 exam candidates
74th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.7 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 326 exam candidates
71st percentile: average Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 73 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
56th percentile: average Β· 94% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 53 exam candidates
73rd percentile: average Β· 98% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO Β· 53 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.